Print

Air Resistance – Procedure

Equipment

  • Three small coffee filters
  • Three large coffee filters
  • Meterstick

Overview

Reading all of the Procedure before starting will make the experiment much easier!
In this experiment, you will do these tasks (each one is detailed more fully in the subsections below).
( 1 )
|Fair| = constant · vn

Procedure

Please print the worksheet for this lab. You will need this sheet to record your data.

PDF file

Due to the nature of this lab, you will be recording your data, calculations, and graphs in an Excel® spreadsheet. You will upload this spreadsheet in WebAssign.

Terminal Speed

Without a motion detector, the best way to measure the speed is to wait for the speed to become constant. Why will the speed become constant?
There are three images labeled Time 1 (speeding up), Time 2 (speeding up), and Time 3 (constant speed). Each image shows a set of arrows pointing vertically away from an object. In Time 1 the object has a small arrow labeled F_air pointing up, a large arrow labeled F_Earth pointing down, and a medium arrow labeled F_Net pointing down. In Time 2 the object is slightly lower than in Time 1 and has a medium arrow labeled F_air pointing up, a large arrow labeled F_Earth pointing down, and a small arrow labeled F_Net pointing down. In Time 3 the object is lower than in Time 2 and has a large arrow labeled F_air pointing up, a large arrow labeled F_Earth pointing down, and a label F_Net = 0 next to the object.
Figure 1
As the speed of the falling filter increases,
|Fair|
increases (Time 1 and Time 2), until
|Fair| = |Fgrav|
(Time 3). Once the net force is zero, the filter has reached terminal speed.
1
Record the mass of the filters.
2
Measure the terminal speed.
  • a
    Drop the object (1, 2, or 3 filters) from a high location.
  • b
    To make sure terminal speed has been reached, time only the last meter of the fall.
  • c
    Repeat each measurement 4 times, and then average them to get better measurements.
3
Repeat Step 2 for each object (24 measurements in all).

Determining the Magnitude of |Fair|

Once terminal speed is reached, |Fair| = |Fgrav|.
1
Calculate |Fair| for each object.

Graphing the Data

1
Use the provided Excel® spreadsheet to organize your data.
2
Make a graph for the small filters and a second graph for the large filters.
  • a
    To make a graph, click "Charts" on the ribbon or select "Chart..." from the "Insert" menu.
  • b
    Use a scatter plot (not a chart with the points connected) with force on the y-axis and terminal speed on the x-axis.

Finding the Speed Dependence

1
For each size of filter, use a power-law fit to determine the value of n.
  • a
    Right click on the data or go to the "Chart" menu and select "Add Trendline."
  • b
    In the trendline type, select "power," and in options, click the checkbox to display the equation.
  • c
    This will fit the data to equation 1|Fair| = constant · vn, allowing you to determine the value of the exponent, n.

Results

1
Compare your results to the equations in Air Resistance – Concepts. Which one seems to be a better fit for modeling the air resistance of the falling filter? Was there a significant difference between the different filter sizes?
2
Turn in the Excel® file with your data and graphs in WebAssign.

Questions

The full equation for the model of air resistance that uses v2 is
Fair =
1
2
CdρAv2,
where Cd is a drag coefficient, ρ is the density of air, and A is the cross-sectional area of the leading surface.
1
How does this equation match up with your data? Fill in Table 3 using one set of terminal speed and force of air data from each filter type. You will need to determine the relevant area for the filter, and look up data for the density of air. The drag coefficient for a circular leading surface is approximately 0.47 (the ruffles make the shape more complicated, but this can be used as an approximation).
2
Judging by the percent difference between your measured force of air resistance and your calculated value using this method, how would you say this model fits your data? Is the fit better for the large or small filter? Why might that be? What sources might contribute to the difference you encountered?